which one is the best for mysql connection? -


here question below.

case 1:

always make connection or disconnection every tcp client.

case 2:

only make 1 connection , share connection every tcp client.

which 1 best performance? thanks!

i assume architecture n-tier, like:
db_server <---> application <----> many_clients
...and consider solution in application part?
assuming so, still depends:

  1. from performance point of view better have fewer connections. gain of squeezing multiple client requests single connection may small if network has low latency between db_server , application.
  2. the logic of application ensure single (multiplexed) connection can simple, if every client requires 1 query. may complex if communication clients requires doing many sql queries, , if intervene. cost (in terms of aplication complexity) may out-weight small benefits in network performance.

so have consider gain , cost... result depends heavily on both above factors.

of course, can hit connection-table size limit if consider many concurrent connections. or may have securitiy-specific connection limitation between db_server , application. in such cases multiplexing client connection 1 may option.


-

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

scala - 'wrong top statement declaration' when using slick in IntelliJ -

Image
i'm porting project scala 2.9 2.10, therefore have use slick instead of scalaquery. i'm using slick 2.1.0 since supports ms access. according this tutorial , upgrade guide changed robs object class , added val robs : why error message wrong top statement declaration , how rid of it? edit: i'm new scala... according this question seems can't put val outside of methods or classes, right? code above directly in packge. right approach slick then? should move code in class or trait? according this changed val robs = tablequery[robs] to object robs extends tablequery(new robs(_)) {} . no warnings or errors anymore. :)
Read more

c# - DevExpress.Wpf.Grid.InfiniteGridSizeException was unhandled -

Image
when using devexpress, see error: devexpress.wpf.grid.infinitegridsizeexception unhandled message="by default, infinite grid height not allowed since grid rows rendered , hence grid work slowly. fix issue, should place grid container give finite height grid, or should manually specify grid's height or maxheight. note can avoid exception setting gridcontrol.allowinfinitegridsize static property true, in case grid run slowly." the problem dxgrid has infinite height. to fix, set height non-infinite. snoop absolutely invaluable this: if "height" xaml element infinite (i.e. 0 or nan ), can set using one of following: option 1: height="{binding path=actualheight, relativesource={relativesource mode=findancestor, ancestortype=uielement}}" option 2: verticalalignment="stretch" option 3: height="auto" hint: use verticalalignment="stretch" if child of grid <rowdefinition height=
Read more

PySide and Qt Properties: Connecting signals from Python to QML -

i trying run simple pyside appliccation design made in qml. call function in qml python in separated thread. i have following qml view: import qt 4.7 rectangle { visible: true width: 100; height: 100 color: "lightgrey" text { id: datestr objectname: "datestr" x: 10 y: 10 text: "init text" font.pixelsize: 12 function updatedata(text) { datestr.text = qstr(text) console.log("you said: " + text) } } } here application: some imports.... #!/usr/bin/python import sys import time pyside import qtdeclarative, qtcore pyside.qtgui import qapplication pyside.qtdeclarative import qdeclarativeview the qthread worker.... #worker thread class worker(qtcore.qthread): updateprogress = qtcore.signal(int) def __init__(self, child): qtcore.qthread.__init__(self) self.child = child def run(self):
Read more