resharper - Do redundant expressions, directives and qualifiers impact performance? -


i'm working else's code right , resharper giving me lot of warnings redundant code, such as:

  • unused directives
  • array creation expressions (new string[]{xxx,xxx,xxx} instead of {xxx,xxx,xxx})
  • explicit delegate creation (new eventhandler(xxx) instead of xxx)
  • qualifiers (system.windows.forms.form instead of form when directives used)

there lot of code work with, i'm not sure if it's worth going through , removing redundant code.

with in mind, wanted ask if these warnings there improve code style (for aesthetics) or pieces of code perform operations , impact performance little?

it depends.

  • unused using directives don't matter.

  • abbreviated array initializers i'm pretty sure compile same cil

  • explicit delegate creation i'm not sure, i'd expect same performance

  • unneeded qualifiers i'm sure compile same cil.

however

the computer's time in general much less important your time, or time of else reading code. take piece of code , replace ints system.int32s , take longer read , longer understand, , important 'performance' metrics.

programs must written people read, , incidentally machines execute, cleverer person me once wrote.


-

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

scala - 'wrong top statement declaration' when using slick in IntelliJ -

Image
i'm porting project scala 2.9 2.10, therefore have use slick instead of scalaquery. i'm using slick 2.1.0 since supports ms access. according this tutorial , upgrade guide changed robs object class , added val robs : why error message wrong top statement declaration , how rid of it? edit: i'm new scala... according this question seems can't put val outside of methods or classes, right? code above directly in packge. right approach slick then? should move code in class or trait? according this changed val robs = tablequery[robs] to object robs extends tablequery(new robs(_)) {} . no warnings or errors anymore. :)
Read more

c# - DevExpress.Wpf.Grid.InfiniteGridSizeException was unhandled -

Image
when using devexpress, see error: devexpress.wpf.grid.infinitegridsizeexception unhandled message="by default, infinite grid height not allowed since grid rows rendered , hence grid work slowly. fix issue, should place grid container give finite height grid, or should manually specify grid's height or maxheight. note can avoid exception setting gridcontrol.allowinfinitegridsize static property true, in case grid run slowly." the problem dxgrid has infinite height. to fix, set height non-infinite. snoop absolutely invaluable this: if "height" xaml element infinite (i.e. 0 or nan ), can set using one of following: option 1: height="{binding path=actualheight, relativesource={relativesource mode=findancestor, ancestortype=uielement}}" option 2: verticalalignment="stretch" option 3: height="auto" hint: use verticalalignment="stretch" if child of grid <rowdefinition height=
Read more

PySide and Qt Properties: Connecting signals from Python to QML -

i trying run simple pyside appliccation design made in qml. call function in qml python in separated thread. i have following qml view: import qt 4.7 rectangle { visible: true width: 100; height: 100 color: "lightgrey" text { id: datestr objectname: "datestr" x: 10 y: 10 text: "init text" font.pixelsize: 12 function updatedata(text) { datestr.text = qstr(text) console.log("you said: " + text) } } } here application: some imports.... #!/usr/bin/python import sys import time pyside import qtdeclarative, qtcore pyside.qtgui import qapplication pyside.qtdeclarative import qdeclarativeview the qthread worker.... #worker thread class worker(qtcore.qthread): updateprogress = qtcore.signal(int) def __init__(self, child): qtcore.qthread.__init__(self) self.child = child def run(self):
Read more