c# - Collection as key in Dictionary -


i have dictionary this:

var dic = dictionary<collection<myobject>, string>

then add entry this:

dic.add(myobjcoll, "1");

where myobjcoll contains single entry

on second run try add entry dic myobjcoll has 2 entries (one of them same 1 in first run) , exception key exists.

what missing here? expect dictionary key collection , surely 2 collections different number of entries cannot identical.

edit: happened myobjcoll initialized outside foreach , during second iteration updated. thought new collection 2 entries old 1 entry collection additional entry added.

to elaborate bit on issue:

i have collection of product row objects. each product identification object consisting of collection of key value pairs:

collection<productkeyvaluepair> productidentification; myproductrow.productidentification = productidentification;

i have construct collection of productkeyvaluepairs defining "owner" of each product row object (one product row object can have multiple owners) , need add each owner correspoding procuct row object(s). traditional many many common key collection of keyvaluepairs.

hard explain it's down legacy data returned old systems running on mainframe , stored in hierarchical database of sort :-/

keys in dictionaries expected immutable while performing role key. if change value of gethashcode() or equals(object) undefined behavior.

(also if collection not implement gethashcode() , equals(object) use members contains comparison reference container object itself)


-

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

PySide and Qt Properties: Connecting signals from Python to QML -

i trying run simple pyside appliccation design made in qml. call function in qml python in separated thread. i have following qml view: import qt 4.7 rectangle { visible: true width: 100; height: 100 color: "lightgrey" text { id: datestr objectname: "datestr" x: 10 y: 10 text: "init text" font.pixelsize: 12 function updatedata(text) { datestr.text = qstr(text) console.log("you said: " + text) } } } here application: some imports.... #!/usr/bin/python import sys import time pyside import qtdeclarative, qtcore pyside.qtgui import qapplication pyside.qtdeclarative import qdeclarativeview the qthread worker.... #worker thread class worker(qtcore.qthread): updateprogress = qtcore.signal(int) def __init__(self, child): qtcore.qthread.__init__(self) self.child = child def run(self):
Read more

c# - DevExpress.Wpf.Grid.InfiniteGridSizeException was unhandled -

Image
when using devexpress, see error: devexpress.wpf.grid.infinitegridsizeexception unhandled message="by default, infinite grid height not allowed since grid rows rendered , hence grid work slowly. fix issue, should place grid container give finite height grid, or should manually specify grid's height or maxheight. note can avoid exception setting gridcontrol.allowinfinitegridsize static property true, in case grid run slowly." the problem dxgrid has infinite height. to fix, set height non-infinite. snoop absolutely invaluable this: if "height" xaml element infinite (i.e. 0 or nan ), can set using one of following: option 1: height="{binding path=actualheight, relativesource={relativesource mode=findancestor, ancestortype=uielement}}" option 2: verticalalignment="stretch" option 3: height="auto" hint: use verticalalignment="stretch" if child of grid <rowdefinition height=
Read more

scala - 'wrong top statement declaration' when using slick in IntelliJ -

Image
i'm porting project scala 2.9 2.10, therefore have use slick instead of scalaquery. i'm using slick 2.1.0 since supports ms access. according this tutorial , upgrade guide changed robs object class , added val robs : why error message wrong top statement declaration , how rid of it? edit: i'm new scala... according this question seems can't put val outside of methods or classes, right? code above directly in packge. right approach slick then? should move code in class or trait? according this changed val robs = tablequery[robs] to object robs extends tablequery(new robs(_)) {} . no warnings or errors anymore. :)
Read more